<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Compliance Wire &#187; Misclassified workers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.workforcelogic.com/tag/misclassified-workers/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.workforcelogic.com</link>
	<description>Workforce Compliance News and Information for today&#039;s businesses</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 18:01:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>SB 459 Update: It Passed!</title>
		<link>http://blog.workforcelogic.com/2011/10/sb-459-update-it-passed.html</link>
		<comments>http://blog.workforcelogic.com/2011/10/sb-459-update-it-passed.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2011 04:23:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Chavez</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[1099]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Independent contractor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Misclassified workers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[california labor commisioner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[penalties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1099 contractor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1099 independent contractor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employee misclassification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax cheats]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.workforcelogic.com/?p=1481</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On Sunday October 9th, in the second to last batch of bills requiring action, Governor Jerry Brown signed SB 459 into law which will now prohibit companies from willfully misclassifying workers as independent contractors.   California becomes the latest state to enact a law that targets companies who illegally misclassify workers.  With each new law, comes [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On Sunday October 9<sup>th</sup>, in the second to last batch of bills requiring action, Governor Jerry Brown signed SB 459 into law which will now prohibit companies from willfully misclassifying workers as independent contractors.   California becomes the latest state to enact a law that targets companies who illegally misclassify workers.  With each new law, comes a punishment and this one is no different.  Each violation or individual infraction will result in fines ranging from $5,000 to $15,000.  Should the California Workforce Labor Development Agency determine that an employer displays a violation pattern, the employer’s penalties will increase from $10,000 to $25,000 per violation.</p>
<h4> Scarlet Letter</h4>
<p>Financial penalty is not the only form of punishment employers will have to endure. Those found guilty of violating the law must also display a notice to the employees and general public stating the details of the violation. The notice must be signed by an officer of the company and be posted on the employer’s website or place of business (if the employer has no website) for <em>one full year</em>. Hester Prynne, is that you?</p>
<h4>Job Killer Act</h4>
<p>When yours truly blogged on this bill last month, I didn&#8217;t think that it had the slightest chance of passing. After all, people were calling it the “Job Killer Act” and unemployment in California was at 12.1%.  Not to mention, there was  no way that the  Governor would approve a bill that brands those who break the law. Apparently Gov. Brown didn&#8217;t pay any attention to the frivolous chatter when he put his pen to work and signed the bill. </p>
<h4>Employers have to pay attention to how they classify their workers</h4>
<p>The California Labor Commissioner is out to make an example of businesses that make a practice of cheating the system. Construction industry can you hear me? Though this bill does not specifically name that industry, it’s not hard to read between the lines and understand for whom this bill is intended. However anyone outside of construction, I don’t recommend testing your fate. When this legislation officially becomes law in January, employers will finally have to pay attention to how they classify their workforce or face the consequences.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.workforcelogic.com/2011/10/sb-459-update-it-passed.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FedEx grounded for worker misclassification practices</title>
		<link>http://blog.workforcelogic.com/2009/10/fedex-grounded-for-worker-misclassification-practices.html</link>
		<comments>http://blog.workforcelogic.com/2009/10/fedex-grounded-for-worker-misclassification-practices.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 00:18:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephanie Ellis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Employment law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Misclassified workers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1099 independent contractor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employee misclassification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[teamsters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[worker misclassification]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.workforcelogic.com/?p=975</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[FedEx prepares to do battle with yet another opponent in the war on worker misclassification. 
On Tuesday the Attorneys general from New York, New Jersey and Montana issued a letter of warning to FedEx regarding its current independent contractor driver model.  If FedEx would not abandon its current independent contractor model for home delivery drivers they would [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h2>FedEx prepares to do battle with yet another opponent in the war on worker misclassification. </h2>
<p>On Tuesday the Attorneys general from <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704500604574485601298522432.html" target="_blank">New York, New Jersey and Montana </a>issued a letter of warning to FedEx regarding its current independent contractor driver model.  If FedEx would not <a href="http://blog.timesunion.com/capitol/archives/19233/a-m-roundup-27/#" target="_blank">abandon </a>its current independent contractor model for home delivery drivers they would be forced to bring suit against the shipping giant. </p>
<p>The letter contained harsh accusations like &#8220;blatantly misclassifying its drivers&#8221;; FedEx Ground has denied these individuals the employment rights guaranteed by law. Practices which would support the allegations of worker misclassification and cited by the AG’s; the work performed is a core competency of FedEx Ground, drivers integrated into business functions of the company, determines the hours drivers work, how they load and deliver packages, and limits the drivers ability to compete other employment. The inability to work for the competition clearly creates financial dependency on Fed-Ex similar to that of an employee.  </p>
<p>More than 1,000 drivers would be impacted by the changes should FedEx cave in under the pressure from this powerhouse. FedEx must respond with a decision by October 27, 2009 a deadline that is fast approaching.  Should Fed-Ex disregard the letter the AG&#8217;s will have little choice but to file suit. The AG’s are confident they would win the suit based on its findings during the investigation of FedEx worker practices. According to the AG&#8217;s there is more than enough evidence of worker misclassification. </p>
<p>The suit is being called a “multistate effort” and this is <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/pressRelease/idUS231770+20-Oct-2009+PRN20091020" target="_blank">not the first time </a>this issue has come up with Fed-Ex. Earlier this year in June attorneys general from six other states wrote to FedEx Ground, demanding changes to the existing driver model. States are teaming up forming a task force in hopes of pressuring FedEx Ground to change its driver business model.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.workforcelogic.com/2009/10/fedex-grounded-for-worker-misclassification-practices.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Get &#8220;Your&#8221; Classification Right!</title>
		<link>http://blog.workforcelogic.com/2009/10/get-your-classification-right.html</link>
		<comments>http://blog.workforcelogic.com/2009/10/get-your-classification-right.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 02:31:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephanie Ellis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Employment law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Independent contractor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wage and Hour]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1099 independent contractor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[audit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Compliance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FLSA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Misclassified workers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[underground workforce]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.workforcelogic.com/?p=965</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Employee or Independent Contractor Classification Classes for Contractors!
No money to conduct random audits? Are furloughs wreaking havoc on your ability to deploy auditors?  One state finds a creative way to uncover a few employees and drum up payroll taxes simply by advertising free self-classification classes! 
 Iowa Workforce Development is advertising assistance with proper worker classification to contractors. Just [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h2>Employee or Independent Contractor Classification Classes for Contractors!</h2>
<p>No money to conduct random audits? Are furloughs wreaking havoc on your ability to deploy auditors?  One state finds a <a href="http://www.iowaworkforce.org/news/XcNewsPlus.asp?cmd=view&amp;articleid=748" target="_blank">creative way</a> to uncover a few employees and drum up payroll taxes simply by advertising free self-classification classes! </p>
<p> Iowa Workforce Development is advertising assistance with proper worker classification to contractors. Just think in one hour you too can become an expert in worker classification.  You will learn how to tell the difference between an employee and independent contractor and determine if you are properly classified!  The goal at the end of the class is to make you an expert and help the state reduce the number of misclassified workers in Iowa.  &#8220;Getting the classification correct is critical for tax, wage, unemployment, workers’ compensation and other employment issues.   Getting it wrong can cost an employer$$&#8221;.</p>
<p>This offering is just another example of what lengths the states will go to in order to demonstrate the <a href="http://www.workforce.com/archive/feature/24/98/76/index.php" target="_blank">renewed emphasis </a>of enforcement by federal and state regulators.  Misclassified workers step forward to be reclassified; employers are identified then fined resulting in a new flow of future payroll tax revenues.  What a great way to get the cash flowing into the state and federal governments <a href="http://money.cnn.com/news/economy/index.html" target="_blank">empty coffers! </a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.workforcelogic.com/2009/10/get-your-classification-right.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Larry Cable Guy Running More Than Just Cable</title>
		<link>http://blog.workforcelogic.com/2009/10/larry-cable-guy-running-more-than-just-cable.html</link>
		<comments>http://blog.workforcelogic.com/2009/10/larry-cable-guy-running-more-than-just-cable.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 17:51:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nelson admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Employment taxation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Misclassified workers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Subcontractor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1099]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employee misclassification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Independent contractor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wage and hour]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[worker misclassification]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.workforcelogic.com/?p=937</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The threads of this cable story twist and turn in every direction. Tangled and knotted up so badly it&#8217;s difficult to locate the epicenter. 
Larry the cable guy was hired by RCN as an independent installer where he happily worked for years.  Suddenly Larry loses his job, has no money and then decides to file for unemployment where he is turned down. Seems [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The threads of this cable story twist and turn in every direction. Tangled and knotted up so badly it&#8217;s difficult to locate the epicenter. </p>
<p>Larry the cable guy was hired by <a href="http://news.bostonherald.com/business/general/view.bg?articleid=1176207" target="_blank">RCN as an independent installer </a>where he happily worked for years.  Suddenly Larry loses his job, has no money and then decides to file for unemployment where he is turned down. Seems independent contractors are not eligible to collect unemployment benefits. Larry learns had he worked as a regular RCN employee he would be <a href="http://www.patriotledger.com/business/x795247901/BUSINESS-IN-BRIEF-RCN-faces-an-overtime-suit-from-a-former-independent-contractor" target="_blank">eligible to draw benefits </a>and receive a weekly pay check. Larry gets an idea and a lawyer who claims Larry was misclassified as an independent contractor when he really should have been an employee.  Larry&#8217;s lawyer files suit against RCN on Larry&#8217;s behalf and oh by the way several other cable guys who also were misclassified as independent contractors. What started out as a story of one individual who lost his job and needed money quickly turns into a class action law suit thrusting a cable installation company into the hot seat. The cable guy story broke in June 2009.  </p>
<p>It’s now fall and Larry is in the news once again this time suing <a href="http://www.bostonherald.com/business/general/view/20091002ex-cable_installer_sues_comcast/#" target="_blank">Comcast Corporation </a>for the same reason he sued RCN; employee misclassification.  Seems Larry had multiple clients err employers in 2009 with RCN and Comcast named as such. This suit is slightly different in that a third party has been added to a complex equation. Triwire Engineering a subcontractor for Comcast is also named accused of bank rolling the payroll for the cable giant. According to Larry he worked as a Comcast installer paid through Triwire from March until August then suddenly fired after TriWire allegedly learned of his suit against his previous employer RCN.  This latest lawsuit against Comcast and Tri-Wire is much bigger than a weekly paycheck. The duo is accused of violating the federal Fair Labor Standards Act and Massachusetts’ independent contractor and overtime laws.  Should Larry win it could mean a lifetime of paychecks! </p>
<p>With the economy still upside down employers must tread lightly when using independent contractors. Other unsuspecting employers accused of similar misdeeds by <a href="http://http://www.lasvegassun.com/news/2009/aug/20/suit-claims-cox-communications-installers-werent-p/" target="_blank">copycat contractors </a>include cable giants Cox Communications and Charter along with a multitude of subcontracting entities.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.workforcelogic.com/2009/10/larry-cable-guy-running-more-than-just-cable.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>IRS Sponsored Employer Tax Audit Lottery</title>
		<link>http://blog.workforcelogic.com/2009/09/irs-sponsored-employer-tax-audit-lottery.html</link>
		<comments>http://blog.workforcelogic.com/2009/09/irs-sponsored-employer-tax-audit-lottery.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 22:08:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephanie Ellis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[1099]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment taxation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Independent contractor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Misclassified workers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1099 independent contractor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax cheats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[worker misclassification]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.workforcelogic.com/?p=894</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[More than 6,000 employers hold a winning ticket and don&#8217;t even know it. Will you be one of the lucky ones?
Beginning in November 2009 the IRS will launch its latest National Research Program (NRP). This NRP will be focused on conducting employment tax audits.
Of the 6,000 employers unknowingly entered into the IRS lottery 2,000 of them will be declared [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More than <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601103&amp;sid=anpR2t09GIeU" target="_blank">6,000 employers </a>hold a winning ticket and don&#8217;t even know it. Will you be one of the lucky ones?</p>
<p>Beginning in <a href="http://www.littler.com/PressPublications/Lists/ASAPs/DispASAPs.aspx?List=edb4a871%2D9e73%2D4eae%2Dbf81%2D3d045b6ede6d&amp;ID=1429" target="_blank">November 2009 the IRS will launch its latest National Research Program (NRP).</a> This NRP will be focused on conducting employment tax audits.</p>
<p>Of the 6,000 employers unknowingly entered into the IRS lottery 2,000 of them will be declared winners in 2009.  The grand prize?  Fines, penalties and plenty of bad publicity. These unlucky employers up until the moment they are officially notified have no idea they have been entered into this audit sweepstakes.  They were randomly selected by the IRS and with any luck will come out of the audit only slightly bruised. </p>
<p>Basis for these audits?  The U.S. Treasury Department released a study on the U.S. &#8220;tax gap&#8221;; the difference between taxes owed and taxes not paid by tax cheats. Who are they? They are employers who underreport, underpay or simply never file. The Treasury estimates a tax gap of $345 billion and the IRS views the gap as justification for the audits.</p>
<p>What is your plan of action should your number be declared a winner?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.workforcelogic.com/2009/09/irs-sponsored-employer-tax-audit-lottery.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fed-Ex versus IRS $14mm</title>
		<link>http://blog.workforcelogic.com/2009/09/fed-ex-versus-irs-14mm.html</link>
		<comments>http://blog.workforcelogic.com/2009/09/fed-ex-versus-irs-14mm.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 21:19:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephanie Ellis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[1099]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Misclassified workers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wage and Hour]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1099 independent contractor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[class action lawsuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FedEx lawsuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Independent contractor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax cheats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wage and hour]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[worker misclassification]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.workforcelogic.com/?p=887</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[FedEx Corporation may face $14 million in taxes and penalties plus interest over the misuse of independent contractors in its FedEx Home Delivery division in 2002. The fines and penalties are related to uncollected employment and withholding taxes for 2002.
FedEx plans to challenge the IRS finding from the audit however final resolution any time soon highly unlikely.
&#8220;We believe that we [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FedEx Corporation may face <a href="http://http://www.knoxnews.com/news/2009/sep/11/irs-audit-stings-fedex-14m/" target="_blank">$14 million in taxes and penalties </a>plus interest over the misuse of independent contractors in its FedEx Home Delivery division in 2002. The fines and penalties are related to uncollected employment and withholding taxes for 2002.</p>
<p>FedEx plans to <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601103&amp;sid=anpR2t09GIeU" target="_blank">challenge the IRS</a> finding from the audit however final resolution any time soon highly unlikely.</p>
<p>&#8220;We believe that we have strong defenses to the proposed assessment and will vigorously defend our position, as we continue to believe that all of FedEx Ground&#8217;s independent contractors, including those providing the FedEx Home Delivery service, are independent contractors,&#8221; FedEx said in the filing.</p>
<p>The IRS is also reviewing Fed-Ex for <a href="http://blog.workforcelogic.com/2008/12/fedex-really-st-nick.html" target="_blank">similar issues </a>related to tax years 2004 - 2008.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.workforcelogic.com/2009/09/fed-ex-versus-irs-14mm.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Subcontractor is to blame for copycat cable guy suit</title>
		<link>http://blog.workforcelogic.com/2009/08/subcontractor-to-blame-copycat-cable-guy-suit.html</link>
		<comments>http://blog.workforcelogic.com/2009/08/subcontractor-to-blame-copycat-cable-guy-suit.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 04:10:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephanie Ellis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[1099]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment taxation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Independent contractor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Misclassified workers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Subcontractor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1099 independent contractor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[class action lawsuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[construction workers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employee misclassification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shadow workforce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[underground workforce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[worker misclassification]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.workforcelogic.com/?p=854</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Cable company made to pay for subcontractors underground operations
Looks like Larry the Cable Guy has company. Communications companies are being bombarded with worker claims of unpaid overtime , worker misclassification and unlicensed workers. Joseph Valdez, cable installer filed a lawsuit against several cable giants claiming he was cheated out of unpaid wages. Attorneys for the plaintiff have accused the cable [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-size: 8pt;color: black;font-family: Verdana">Cable company <a href="http://www.lasvegassun.com/news/2009/aug/20/suit-claims-cox-communications-installers-werent-p/" target="_blank">made to pay </a>for subcontractors underground operations</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 8pt;color: black;font-family: Verdana">Looks like <a href="http://blog.workforcelogic.com/wp-admin/post.php?action=edit&amp;post=632" target="_blank">Larry the Cable Guy </a>has company. Communications companies are being bombarded with worker claims of unpaid overtime , worker misclassification and <a href="http://www.accessmylibrary.com/coms2/summary_0286-35792704_ITM" target="_blank">unlicensed workers</a>. Joseph Valdez, cable installer filed a lawsuit against several <a href="http://www.lasvegassun.com/news/2009/aug/20/suit-claims-cox-communications-installers-werent-p/" target="_blank"><span style="color: purple"><span style="color: #800080">cable giants </span></span></a>claiming he was cheated out of unpaid wages. Attorneys for the plaintiff have accused the cable companies of worker misclassification and unpaid overtime. The overtime claim is not warranted in a case where the workers were hired as independent contractors. Is this a clear cut case of employer intentional misclassification paying the workers as independent contractors to avoid employer obligations? Perhaps it’s a simple case of misinformed cable companies duped by its sub-contractors providing the installers. Often a company finds itself in the middle of a legal dispute due to ignorance of the subcontractor’s actual relationship with its workers. These companies enter into an arrangement with the subcontractors under the impression the workers are paid as employees after all the contract prohibits them from supplying 1099 contractors. The unsuspecting company is totally unaware of any misconduct. Typically an organization will engage a subcontractor and assume they operate a legitimate business.  Only when a worker files a complaint against the subcontractor do they become painfully aware of a bad employment arrangement and stuck in the middle of a hellish nightmare!</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 8pt;color: black;font-family: Verdana">In June a former cable installer<a href="http://news.bostonherald.com/business/general/view.bg?articleid=1176207" target="_self"> filed suit against RCN Corp. </a>claiming he was an employee and not an independent contractor. Fritz and more than 1,000 other U.S. installers are paid as “independent contractors and recognize this arrangement has ripped them off for years.  They claimed they have been deprived of overtime and other <a href="http://www.patriotledger.com/business/x795247901/BUSINESS-IN-BRIEF-RCN-faces-an-overtime-suit-from-a-former-independent-contractor" target="_self">employee benefits </a>enjoyed by RCN employees</span><span style="font-size: small"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman">.</span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 8pt;color: black;font-family: Verdana">An unsuspecting business can sidestep these types of legal problems by taking time to run a thorough check on its subcontractors. A couple of phone calls and a few hard hitting questions about its hiring practices may turn out to be time well spent!<span>  </span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.workforcelogic.com/2009/08/subcontractor-to-blame-copycat-cable-guy-suit.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

