<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Compliance Wire &#187; Homeland Security</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.workforcelogic.com/tag/homeland-security/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.workforcelogic.com</link>
	<description>Workforce Compliance News and Information for today&#039;s businesses</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 18:01:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Employers 670 New Reasons Why Comply</title>
		<link>http://blog.workforcelogic.com/2009/07/employers-670-new-reasons-why-comply.html</link>
		<comments>http://blog.workforcelogic.com/2009/07/employers-670-new-reasons-why-comply.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 18:26:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephanie Ellis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Employment taxation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Misclassified workers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wage and Hour]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1099 independent contractor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Homeland Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OSHA; department of labor; Hilda Solis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Undocumented workers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[worker misclassification]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.workforcelogic.com/?p=691</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Department of Labor will add 670 new investigators by 2010.
Secretary of Labor Hilda L. Solis inadvertently just got a little help from her friends over at Homeland Security.  ICE dropped off more than 650 audit notices yesterday and to pull off that number of audits it will take a heap of cash!
Solis should have no trouble [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h2>The Department of Labor will add 670 new investigators by 2010.</h2>
<p>Secretary of Labor Hilda L. Solis inadvertently just got a little help from her friends over at Homeland Security.  ICE dropped off more than <a href="http://www.ice.gov/pi/nr/0907/090701washington.htm" target="_blank">650 audit notices </a>yesterday and to pull off that number of audits it will take a heap of cash!</p>
<p>Solis should have no trouble obtaining the funds she needs to help get her own house in order.  Solis is on a mission after receiving a copy of the release of a Governmental Accountability Office (GAO) report she announced the department&#8217;s system for receiving and responding to wage and hour complaints is ineffective and discourages wage-theft complaints.   &#8220;The department&#8217;s Wage and Hour Division has already begun the process of adding 150 new investigators to its field offices to refocus the agency on these enforcement responsibilities.&#8221;  In addition, under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, the agency will hire 100 investigators to ensure that contractors on stimulus projects are in compliance.</p>
<p>The DOL is poised to receive a whopping <a href="http://www.businessmanagementdaily.com/authors/14/HR-Specialist:-Employment-Law" target="_blank">$1.7 Billion dollars </a>to help bolster worker protection programs putting every employer on notice. Sneak peek at who gets what if Solis has it her way. Leading the pack the Wage &amp; Hour division is to receive $228 million and 200 new auditors, and then there is OSHA &#8211; $560 million and 160 new auditors.</p>
<p>Ouch!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.workforcelogic.com/2009/07/employers-670-new-reasons-why-comply.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>DHS Contractor Hiring Practices</title>
		<link>http://blog.workforcelogic.com/2008/07/dhs-contractor-hiring-practices.html</link>
		<comments>http://blog.workforcelogic.com/2008/07/dhs-contractor-hiring-practices.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 05:35:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephanie Ellis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[IRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Independent contractor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Misclassified workers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Subcontractor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1099 contractor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contract labor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DHS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Homeland Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[i ndependent contractor]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://Compliance.mu.nelsonhr.com/2008/dhs-contractor-hiring-practices/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Homeland Security has more contractors than government employees who are so deeply ingrained in governmental functions potentially influencing decisions well outside the duties of a hired gun. A Senate Committee looking into the matter <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wpdyn/content/article/2007/10/16/AR2007101602038.html">uncovered</a> the justification for this hiring practice. The long standing practice of hiring contractors to fill open positions earmarked for W-2 employees has created a situation that is not easily rectified. The committee determined the department lacks in-house expertise and institutional knowledge and must rely on contractors to fill the needs of the department and issued a &#8220;strong urging&#8221; to DHS to change its hiring practices. The problem is so pervasive an overnight change is not possible. Robert Burton, Deputy Administrator of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy said &#8220;the question is, <a href="http://www.fcw.com/online/news/153124-1.html">what rules will govern </a>that relationship. </p>
<p>What?? Ask any private employer and they can quote the rules for hiring contractors and the pitfalls of improper worker classification. Compared to the hammers and large boons lowered on non-government employers who utilize the exact same hiring practices it seems very little has been done to influence <a href="http://durbin.senate.gov/showRelease.cfm?releaseId=282992">change in governmental </a>hiring practices. Company&#8217;s in the private sector have <a href="http://www.crn.com/it-channel/18812579">endured years of harsh financial penalties</a>, been <a href="http://www.bizjournals.com/philadelphia/stories/2008/06/09/daily12.html?ana=from_rss">threatened with 3rd degree felony </a>charges, paid fines and penalties in the billion dollar range for misclassifying workers.&nbsp; Compared to a &#8220;strong urging&#8221; to fix the problem and a check for $39 million in procurement dollars to hire regular employees the punishment pales in comparison. </p>
<p>This milk toast approach towards DHS and other government entities from those who push employers to do the right thing by its own workers seems less than adequate. The message to ALL employers should be equal playing field for all.&nbsp; To fix the age old contract worker misclassification problem&nbsp;we must lead by example and not from the platform of do I say not as I do. Otherwise, how can we expect employers to take the pitfalls of worker classification seriously if those who do the policing are not adhering to the law?</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.workforcelogic.com/2008/07/dhs-contractor-hiring-practices.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

