All Glitz No Gold

Home based virtual staff seems to be the wave of the future for small business owners who want to sidestep the headaches and the expense of a traditional brick and mortar office.

Given the current economic downturn, employers everywhere are taking necessary steps to reduce costs, often starting with staff cuts forcing them to seek out temporary workers or independent contractors to help fill the void. Today's employers are entertaining all options that offer cost  savings including those that address costs associated with a fulltime workforce. A highly successful offering with Canadian employers Virtual Pro is a huge hit in the U.S market since it was launched by StaffPro America in February. Employers who are looking for alternatives to the traditional staffing model have been very receptive to this new idea because of all the front end pluses. The model allows employers to gain access to a transient talent pool, work can be project based with no long term commitments and virtually no employer responsibilities that go along with traditional employment. It seems employers have embraced this concept and this could be a leg up on the competition for StaffPro. 

Although StaffPro acknowledges the solution is still very much a traditional staffing firm model it is unique in that neither party bears the responsibility of the employer given the workers are "independent contractors" and "self employed". These individuals are responsible for adhering to the riggers associated with operating a business paying their own taxes, obtaining other clients, writing handling the contract and when the project is done neither the employer nor the staffing company has unemployment costs to worry about. Given this alternative worker model has been so successful in Canada StaffPro is optimistic they can repeat it in the U.S. A huge advantage for StaffPro it has no local competitors and it expects to boost its revenue by 19 percent this year if this endeavor is a hit. 

A possible success factor for the Canadian operation maybe in the past revenue seeking agencies in Canada has not been as aggressive in its employer auditing efforts as the IRS in the U.S. However in the last 5 years numerous worker misclassification cases against employers have been tried and won and employer compliance continues to be a focus in Canada. In the U.S. employer workforce compliance has endured heavy scrutiny given it is at the forefront of political campaigns, on the lips of workers and numerous notable cases make the headlines on a daily basis. Now more than ever employers must ensure the programs and solutions they adopt are carefully scrutinized for potential risks to avoid the missteps of companies like FedEx and others. Working on a project basis from your home does not make an independent contractor.  In any employee-independent contractor review, all information that provides evidence of the degree of control and the degree of independence will be scrutinized. Meeting the requirements set by both the state and federal government to be deemed self employed is no easy task. Specific worker types requiring heavy supervision, little or no specialized education or training and hourly payments is typically viewed as indicative of an employer/employee relationship. If the auditing agency feels the employer company has the right to control the relationship (whether they ever exercise the right or not) the mere fact that it exists is enough to reclassify a worker. Should the agency render a reclassification determination an employer must be named for payment of back taxes, fines and penalties assessed for this error in judgment. 

The costs of worker misclassification can be financially devastating to small client companies possibly resulting in financial ruin. Employers looking to avoid the added costs associated with traditional staffing models must look at all aspects of the staffing model beyond the costs and real employer obligations. Take a peek under the hood and kick the tires before signing on that dotted line.  Remember, just because you call them independent contractors doesn't make it so.